Repartee Room

Go forth and be witty!

A place to…Converse…Be Witty…AND…R-E-S-I-S-T!

Surgeon General Nominee Dismisses Homosexuality Paper

Thanks to my pal Nick for catching this story first.  His comment, "You gotta love the Bush administration. *SIGH*," is hard to dispute.  Holsinger doesn’t even have the job yet, and he already sounds like an administration lackey.  Thank goodness he has evolved from his findings back in 1991 when he concluded, "when the complementarily of the sexes is breached, injuries and diseases may occur."  Imagine if he and members of the United Methodists Church still had the same hateful feelings towards homosexuality?  I shutter to think! CJ

By Christopher Lee
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, July 13, 2007; A06

President Bush‘s nominee for surgeon general sought to distance himself yesterday from his controversial 1991 paper on homosexuality and health, saying that it was not a scientific study and that many issues it raised are outdated.

Democrats on the Senate health committee cited the paper in grilling Kentucky cardiologist James W. Holsinger Jr. about whether he could separate ideology from science if he were confirmed.

Much of the hearing was devoted to questions about whether Holsinger would reject the kind of political interference from Bush administration officials that former surgeon general Richard H. Carmona complained of Tuesday in testimony before a House committee.

Holsinger said that he would step down if pressured to put politics above science — but only as a last resort after trying to educate policymakers on the science and forge a consensus.

"Candidly, if I were unable to do that and I was being overridden, if necessary I would resign," he said.

Carmona, who served from 2002 to 2006, told the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform that Bush appointees routinely vetted his speeches for political red flags, told him to mention the president’s name at least three times on every page of his public remarks, and approved or denied his travel appearances with an eye to their political impact. Carmona accused the administration of silencing him on hot-button issues such as embryonic stem cell research and abstinence-only sex education.

Holsinger said he has a track record of bucking political opposition, including his efforts to raise taxes on tobacco in Kentucky, a tobacco-growing state. Yesterday he said he would take on the pharmaceutical industry by calling for a ban on the advertising of drugs directly to consumers.

Gay and lesbian groups and the American Public Health Association have opposed Holsinger’s nomination. Among his supporters is former surgeon general C. Everett Koop.

No committee vote has been scheduled on the nomination, and a spokeswoman for the chairman, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), said he has not decided how he will vote.

Kennedy said Holsinger’s paper was poorly researched and did not reflect the science on sexuality available at the time.

"Dr. Holsinger’s paper cherry-picks and misuses data to support his thesis that homosexuality is unhealthy and unnatural," Kennedy said, adding that as surgeon general Holsinger would have to provide medical information "free of interference from his personal views."

Holsinger said he prepared the paper for a study committee of the United Methodist Church. In it, he argued that the sexes are anatomically complementary and that "when the complementarity of the sexes is breached, injuries and diseases may occur."

Holsinger said yesterday that his views had evolved and that the issues he raised in the paper would not be relevant in public health discussions today. "I have a deep appreciation for the essential humanity of everyone, regardless of their personal circumstances or sexual orientation," he said.

Holsinger, 68, a former Kentucky health secretary and onetime chief medical director of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, said that his highest priorities as surgeon general would be fighting childhood obesity, eliminating tobacco use and helping public-health first responders prepare for terrorist attacks and natural disasters.

3 responses to “Surgeon General Nominee Dismisses Homosexuality Paper”

  1. “There is a part of my life that is so repulsive and dark that I’ve been warring against it all of my adult life.”
    – Ted Haggard, former pastor of the New Life Church
    Pastor Haggard apparently defines “warring against it” as “snorting crystal and paying to party with hot studs.” Shit, that’s an EASY one to confuse.
    But I think Mr. Holsinger might suggest that type of fun violates the complementarity of the sexes (you can ONLY insert Tab P into Slot P, never into Slot A). Then again, he always sucked at Twister.

  2. What a tool.
    But what amazes me is gay rights, research into WHY people are gay, etc. Seems like non topics to me.
    They’re open and closed cases: “Should
    gay people have the same constitutional rights as straight Americans?”
    Uh…yes. They pay the same taxes and thus should be afforded the same
    rights. Remember the civil rights crusade in the 60’s? I thought we were
    done with this. “Why are people gay?”
    Uh…because they are and have been
    since the beginning of time.
    Why are people straight? Who cares, you
    ask? The same with why people are gay. Who cares. It’s life and a genetic
    disposition. Nobody cares why I was born a natural blond, why should they
    care why I was born gay?

  3. I’ve said it far too many times…this country of ours, openly discriminates against a group of people every 20-30 years. Think about it — in order for the bastardization of homosexuality to become legal, those who rally against it have to change the Constitution to ban same sex couples for getting married. What else is there really to say?

Leave a comment